A small signal

I’ve been making art long enough to know that a practice can turn into a room I know well enough to find the light switch in the dark. That familiarity isn’t a failure. It means I’ve lived here, moved the furniture around and made a life in the work. Lately I’ve wanted to shove the sofa over a little and see what’s been hiding under it. I’m not trying to pretend I know nothing. I just want more room for building, play, systems and conversations with language models that I direct, plus more chances for one small offering from someone else to knock it all sideways. My closest thing to a north star is intrigue and delight through play. First I need to be amused … or at least nosy. Then I can invite somebody else in. I want to make things because I’m curious about what they might do, not because I already know the result. Delight doesn’t have to be childish, and intrigue doesn’t need a password. Sometimes it’s only a tiny pressure change, the feeling that a system noticed you, took what you offered and came back a little stranger.

I keep circling the idea of someone typing one word into a work to seed what comes next. It’s an offering, not a label pasted onto a picture’s already finished. I establish a world with a silhouette, a physics and a temperament. The visitor chooses a tendency, a possession, maybe a small risk. Their choice should change what becomes possible without dissolving the work’s point of view into soup. I build the instrument and choose its limits. They touch one key, and the room moves. Boundaries aren’t the enemy of agency. They’re what give a gesture somewhere to land. The pleasure is holding two things at once: I can see the artist’s hand, and I can see that this exact version would not exist without my small intervention. Surprise lives in the spark between them. That’s shared authorship.

Blockchain belongs in this curiosity as material for games and stories, not mainly as a machine for squeezing money out of them. Its ordinary parts are already delightfully weird. A hash can act like weather. A wallet can become a secret stash. Provenance can remember a trail. Ownership can change what a doorway allows. A transaction can become an irreversible move in a tiny on-chain drama, which is a lot more interesting to me than a badge saying the work is important. A chain can keep score, hide and reveal, pass something between strangers, or let a work remember what happened to it. The good bit is what those rules make imaginable.

I’m less interested in becoming famous than in becoming catalytic. I’d love for another artist to leave one of my works more excited about what they might make next. That means sharing a trick instead of guarding every method like a family recipe. My ambition does better with some fresh air. Group shows and a few public presentations feel like a good horizon, enough to meet other practices and let my work try on a room.

None of this asks me to disown the practice that got me here. I want to make it more porous, not stage a dramatic escape. Building can sit beside making. Co-writing can sit beside solitary decisions. Language models can be responsive tools I question, redirect, cut apart, tease and use to find routes I might have missed. They do not provide the artistic judgment, and they are not independent authors waiting politely for a byline. I remain responsible for the direction, the selection, the taste and the refusal. This isn’t a new identity or a career announcement complete with air-horn blasts. It’s a way of keeping the door unlocked. A small signal comes in, a system answers and something neither fixed nor ownerless appears.

← Return to the index